“We had the experience but missed the meaning.”

~ T. S. Eliot

Picture courtesy of The Economist

Here’s an interesting article that The Economist ran back in February of this year, and one that I’d meant to reference during the hotly contested, “A Calorie is not a Calorie” debates.  This is a good, thought provoking article, as I’m aware of the fact that there is a substantial “raw branch” of the Paleo-lifestyle movement.  This article points out a good many of the main reasons why I’m not a “raw” proponent, per se (dairy notwithstanding — if one is to consume dairy at all).  That’s not to say, though, that I’m so sure that I’d go fully on board with this statement:

“Moreover, without cooking, the human brain (which consumes 20-25% of the body’s energy) could not keep running.”

But the rest of Richard Wrangham’s ideas on the subject — namely, that the control of fire, and the resultant cooking of foodstuffs, enabled the evolutionary transition to the modern physique — are, in my opinion, fully correct.

And don’t forget to give a listen to the companion audio clip, as it contains some additional interesting and expounded upon information.

In Health,


Previous articleA Paleo Surf & Turf
Next articleIt Was Just a Matter of Time…
Keith Norris is a former standout athlete, a military vet, and an elite strength and conditioning expert with over 35 years of in-the-trenches experience. As a serial entrepreneur in the health and wellness space, he is an owner, co-founder and Chief Development Officer of the largest Paleo conference in the world, Paleo f(x) . As well, Keith is a partner in one of the most innovative lines of boutique training studios in the nation, Efficient Exercise. He’s also a partner in ARXFit training equipment, and a founding member of ID Life. In his spare time, he authors one of the top fitness blogs in the health and wellness sphere, Theory To Practice.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.